Is it time for a revaluation?
Currently, there are few viable alternatives to the U.S. dollar as a global reserve currency, but this does not mean that vigorous debate around the subject has been absent. The pundits are polarised – some support a complete revaluation, as they feel using the Dollar as the reserve currency is no longer viable, while others predict untold turmoil if the status quo changes.
There have been a few options suggested to replace the dollar. Both the euro and the renminbi have potential, and even the little-known SDR has been put forward. The wild card, If Mark Zuckerberg has his way, is Facebook’s digital currency Libra.
Why does the dollar hold onto the top spot as a reserve currency?
Central banks around the world hold large amounts of dollar-denominated assets, predominantly U.S. government bonds. They hold these reserves to maintain exchange-rate pegs, to insure against capital outflows and to facilitate international trade. It remains the reserve currency because it has robust political and economic institutions, it’s a democracy, and has strong liquidity in its capital markets.
Only reserve currencies are accepted for international trade, the most popular being the dollar, then the euro, and the yen. According to the International Monetary Fund, the U.S. dollar makes up 60% of all known central bank foreign exchange reserves, the next closest is the euro which makes up 20%. Any chances of the euro taking over from the dollar were diminished by the eurozone crisis, so this has knocked them out of contention for now..
Could the SDR be a challenge?
The SDR (Special Delivery Rights) often emerges as a possibility in volatile markets. It is an artificial currency made up of a basket of currencies including the U.S. dollar, euro, Japanese yen, British pound, and more recently the Chinese renminbi. The SDR was developed to play a significant role in the international reserves arena. The acceptance criteria for membership mandate that a country must have a central bank or government reserves of gold. The currency must also be determined “freely usable” by the IMF, in other words the currency must be widely used to make payments for international transactions and widely traded in the principal exchange markets. SDRs are allocated by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to its member countries and are backed by the member countries.
Despite some parties advocating the use of the SDR as a reserve currency, it is not a currency in the true sense of the word, or by its nature. It can’t be used by individuals, nor is it a medium of exchange. SDRs can possibly be exchanged for actual currencies but there is no guarantee, as it is essentially a unit of account. Proponents of the SDR maintain that a shift to a basket of world currencies might be the most sensible option. If the euro, yen, GBP and renminbi were to join the dollar as international reserve currencies, it would result in a more stable global economy. Despite allowing economies to compete on a more level playing field, the likelihood of the SDR becoming a contender as a reserve currency is slim.
Last year Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg announced his goal to launch a global digital currency called Libra. A lofty idea but given his track record of growing a multi-billion-dollar social media empire – his claim was taken seriously. While the masses thought it was a good idea, he was stonewalled by politicians, bank executives and a legion of regulators.
At first glance, his currency has all the hallmarks of a cryptocurrency, but it isn’t. His aim was to build a currency that would be centrally managed and consist of a basket of other currencies and assets used to set the value of Libra, therefore keeping it much more stable than cryptocurrencies. The second element of the plan was to build a digital wallet for Libra – built into a selection of apps including Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram – all owned by Facebook Inc.
The incumbent financial regulators and banking fraternity, delivered a blunt “no” stating that it would mean Facebook taking on a government-like role, creating a currency that would have the potential to influence and/or undermine monetary policy.
A Professor at the University of New South Wales, Prof Ross Buckley, published a paper about the many regulatory issues Libra would face. He pointed out that it would have a significant impact on developing countries, where citizens rely on payments from family working abroad. These transfers, known as remittances, can be subject to high fees making it an attractive market to pursue. Facebook’s Libra could potentially disrupt the entire remittance market if people in those countries switched to the Libra currency. It’s easy to see why regulators are up in arms and why the currency would face a raft of regulations.
While there are plenty of people (and money) supporting the growth and eventual integration of cryptocurrencies into the global economy; they still have a long way to go. Their volatility does not put them high on the rankings as a reserve currency.
As long as the current system remains free floating, currency revaluation on a global scale will remain a trending topic. In a world where disruption is on centre stage, we can’t rule out new contenders, but we will probably not see them for a while yet. Meanwhile, central banks are buying more gold, which could signal a lack of confidence in the dollar or the global monetary system more generally. This is a space to watch.